The Salt Lake Tribune -- Prosecutor: Judge Unfit for Weitzel Retrial
Wednesday, November 7, 2001
BY JACOB SANTINI
THE SALT LAKE TRIBUNE
Two weeks ago, 2nd District Judge Thomas Kay defended
himself in writing against allegations of bias in his handling
of the criminal case against psychiatrist Robert Weitzel.
Kay's affidavit, in which he dubs the allegations against
him "misrepresentations, groundless statements and false
accusations," proves he cannot preside over Weitzel's second
trial, prosecutors say.
"Given that Judge Kay views the state's motion and
affidavit as a groundless, personal* attack, he cannot
reasonably be expected to preside over a second trial in which
the same prosecutors will be appearing before him," Davis
County Attorney Mel Wilson wrote in a response filed Monday.
Wilson's filing was sent to Judge Brent West, the
presiding judge of 2nd District Court in Ogden. He will decide
whether Kay will preside over Weitzel's second trial, in the
wake of accusations of prejudice made against him by Wilson.
In July 2000, a jury rejected murder charges against
Weitzel and found him guilty of two counts of second-degree
felony manslaughter and three misdemeanor counts of negligent
homicide. Kay overturned the convictions after learning
prosecutors had not disclosed an expert witness who believes
Weitzel did not illegally cause the deaths of five patients,
who were under his care in a geriatric/psychiatric unit of the
Davis Hospital. Those deaths occurred within a 16-day span
beginning in December 1995.
Shortly after Weitzel was released from prison,
prosecutors accused Kay of an "appearance of bias." They said
Kay unfairly limited the evidence prosecutors were allowed to
present in Weitzel's six-week trial. Wilson also alleged Kay
made prejudicial and hurtful comments to the patients'
families. Kay says the comments were taken out of context.
A status conference for Weitzel's upcoming trial is
scheduled for later this month.
© Copyright 2001, The Salt Lake Tribune
<<Back to Home Page *Nowhere in Judge Kay's Affidavit does he claim Wilson's attack is "personal"