Ogden Standard Examiner Front Page News 
Mar 01, 2002
'60 Minutes' looks at Weitzel case
He agrees to rare interview
Fri, Mar 1, 2002
By NESREEN KHASHAN
Standard-Examiner Davis Bureau
LAYTON - Psychiatrist Robert Weitzel is scheduled to be featured on
the CBS news magazine show "60 Minutes" on Sunday.
The segment will run for about 13 minutes in the middle of the
hour long program that airs on CBS affiliate KUTV Channel 2 at 6 p.m.
Two "60 Minutes" producers and journalist Ed Bradley, who
interviewed Weitzel, spent several days in Davis County late last
November to report the piece.
The Weitzel case is one that has gained him local prominence since
the doctor was first charged with five counts of first-degree felony
murder nearly four years ago.
In his first trial, which lasted six weeks, a jury found Weitzel
guilty of lesser offenses of two counts of second-degree
manslaughter and three misdemeanor counts of negligent homicide in
the deaths of five elderly patients. But that conviction was
overturned in January 2001 when a Farmington judge ruled that the
prosecutors had withheld exculpatory evidence from the defense.
Weitzel now faces a retrial on those same charges he was found
guilty of in the summer of 2000.
Nurses interviewed
Kevin Tedesco, a spokesman for the show, said the piece includes
interviews with two nurses who worked at Davis Hospital and Medical
Center in Layton where the patients under Weitzel's care died within
a three-week period starting in late December 1995. The two nurses,
Laurie Stevenson, a nurse practitioner now practicing in
Pennsylvania, and Earlene Cozzens Cooper, both testified at
Weitzel's first trial. Stevenson's testimony was generally favorable
to the defense during the first trial, while Cooper's statements
were supportive of the prosecutors' claims.
The show also hired two doctors from outside of Utah to review the
medical charts of the five patients who died, Tedesco said. While
the show presented the polar views in the case -- that of
prosecutors who have claimed that Weitzel drugged his patients to
death and that of the defense that the doctor was providing "comfort
care" to his patients -- Tedesco said the two medical consultants
agreed that the care provided was not unusual.
"These two doctors looked at the charts of the elderly people who
passed away and did not think what Dr. Weitzel had done was out of
the ordinary," Tedesco said. "They thought it was proper procedure."
Former Assistant Attorney General Elizabeth Bowman, who is now in
private practice, was interviewed for the story. In the piece,
Bowman dismissed Weitzel's explanation that he was providing pain
management for his patients. Instead Bowman, who is also a nurse,
asserted that geriatric patients don't feel pain in the same way
other patients do.
Differing opinions
"There were no indicators found that any of those patients had
something that we would know to be painful," Bowman said during the
"60 Minutes" interview. "If you or I had a broken bone, we're very
likely to be in a great deal of pain, while an elderly person can
have a fracture and not be aware of it."
Dr. Perry Fine, the University of Utah physician whose testimony
helped lead to the reversal of the first Weitzel conviction, was
also featured in the story.
Tedesco did not mention the names of two key players in the case,
Davis County Attorney Mel Wilson or Weitzel's first attorney, Peter
Stirba, as being among those interviewed.
Weitzel's concerns
Speaking from his Salt Lake City home Thursday, Weitzel said that
although he was initially reluctant, he took a chance with the "60
Minutes" producers when they approached him about being interviewed
for the piece. His misgivings, he said, came from an experience he
had in 2000 when producers of the ABC news magazine show "20/20"
assembled a story about his first trial that he considered shallow
and unbalanced.
"At this time I have no idea how '60 Minutes' will spin this story,
but I took a chance because I believe that casting light on this
case should help me," Weitzel said. "I am sincerely saddened by what
this case has done to the community: the families of my patients,
Davis County, and the medical community and patient care. The
objective of good professional care is to relieve the pain of the
patient and the suffering of the family and the community. This kind
of care should never be misunderstood by the community or attacked by
a prosecutor, and I feel terrible that this misunderstanding has
occurred."
Copyright ©2001, Ogden Publishing Corporation
<<Back to Home Page