Weitzel Wants Davis To Pay
       Aug 03, 2001 
         
            Weitzel wants Davis to pay his attorney fees 
            He claims prosecutors' "failure' to disclose all evidence allows 
            request
            Fri, Aug 3, 2001 00:00:00 
            By NESREEN KHASHAN 
            Standard-Examiner Davis Bureau
            FARMINGTON -- Citing a complete lack of funds and other special 
            circumstances, psychiatrist Dr. Robert Weitzel has petitioned the 
            court for prosecutors to pay for private attorney costs in his 
            upcoming criminal trial.
            The motions filed Thursday by Weitzel's attorney, Walter Bugden, 
            asks 2nd District Judge Thomas Kay to require Davis County to pay 
            for both the doctor's private defense and expert witness fees.
            Utah state law requires that defendants use public defenders 
            contracted through the state in cases when they cannot afford their 
            own representation. That law, however, stipulates that under 
            "extraordinary circumstances" a judge may compel the state to pay 
            for non-contracting legal aid such as Bugden.
            In his motion, Bugden said Weitzel's case was unusually complex for 
            public defenders with already heavy caseloads to take on. He also 
            said the state was obliged to take on the case because of its 
            "failure to disclose exculpatory evidence at the first trial."
            Bugden was referring to Kay's ruling in January that overturned 
            Weitzel's conviction last summer of two counts of manslaughter and 
            three counts of negligent homicide in connection with the deaths of 
            five of his patients. Kay cited the prosecutors' failure to disclose 
            an expert witness opinion to the defense as his reason for 
            nullifying the conviction. Weitzel spent more than $510,000 on 
            private attorney fees in that first trial.
            "It's manifestly unfair for the state to benefit from its own 
            failure to reveal the exculpatory witness testimony in the first 
            trial. . .," Bugden said Thursday. "It's just unseemly for the 
            government to be able to grind someone to the ground and have them 
            expend all their savings, then force that person to go through a 
            second trial without an attorney of his choice."
 
            Deputy county attorney Gary McKean, who handles such requests 
            through the office's civil division, said case law supports 
            Weitzel's motion to have the state pay for expert witnesses. In the 
            2000 Utah State Supreme Court case, the justices ruled that 
            prosecutors must pay for expert witnesses in cases when the 
            defendant is certifiably indigent, even if third parties have been 
            able to pay the costs for a private attorney.
 
            However, prosecutors vowed to challenge the motion for the state to 
            pay for Weitzel's private defense, saying that public defenders can 
            handle the task themselves.
            "We're not going to just roll over and play dead," said deputy 
            county attorney Steven Major. "Our office feels very confident in 
            our public defenders. They are some of the most competent defenders 
            in the state. This may be a complicated case, but not more 
            complicated than some of the homicide cases that have been handled."
            Davis County currently contracts with five attorneys to provide 
            representation to criminal defendants, including juveniles. At least 
            one public defender is assigned a client charged with capital 
            murder.
            Weitzel now faces lesser charges of two second-degree felony counts 
            of manslaughter and three counts of misdemeanor negligent homicide. 
            While the state originally pursued the more severe felony counts the 
            doctor was charged with, last month prosecutors unexpectedly 
            withdrew that motion one day before a double-jeopardy hearing was 
            scheduled. The hearing was held to determine whether Weitzel could 
            be tried on the same charges twice.
            In an affidavit filed with Bugden's motions, Weitzel declared 
            himself indigent and stated that he has spent his remaining funds - 
            $15,000 - to defend his double-jeopardy plea. Weitzel said he has 
            sold all his liquid assets, including his home, car and furniture, 
            and that he is $103,700 in debt. On his personal Web site, on which 
            he has solicited private donations for his defense, Weitzel 
            estimates that his second trial will cost at least $100,000.
 
            "I haven't been working because I've been employed all this time for 
            my lawyers and on my Web site, although I hope to start working 
            soon," Weitzel said Thursday from his Salt Lake City residence.
            Weitzel has yet to declare bankruptcy but has indicated it is likely 
            imminent. Weitzel's pretrial conference for the state case is 
            scheduled in Farmington on Aug. 9.
      Copyright ©2001, Ogden Publishing Corporation 

<<Back to Home Page